[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180311220414.feda33aw72zw2rko@salvia>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 23:04:14 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netfilter: cttimeout: remove VLA in
ctnl_timeout_parse_policy
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:47:55PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA and replace it
> with dynamic memory allocation.
Looks good but...
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> index 95b0470..a2f7d92 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
> @@ -52,18 +52,26 @@ ctnl_timeout_parse_policy(void *timeouts,
> struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> + struct nlattr **tb = NULL;
I think we don't need to initialize this, right?
>
> if (likely(l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj)) {
> - struct nlattr *tb[l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max+1];
> + tb = kcalloc(l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max + 1, sizeof(*tb),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!tb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> ret = nla_parse_nested(tb, l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_max,
> attr, l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nla_policy,
> NULL);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto err;
>
> ret = l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj(tb, net, timeouts);
> }
> +
> +err:
> + kfree(tb);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists