linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/13] perf bpf: Add helper header files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:06:22 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Wangnan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] perf bpf: Add helper header files

Em Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:44:57AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:43:11AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-userapi.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-userapi.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..63f2b4c13a5c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-userapi.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> > +#ifndef __BPF_USERAPI_H
> > +#define __BPF_USERAPI_H
> > +
> > +enum {
> > +	BPF_FUNC_USER_START			= 10000,
> > +	BPF_FUNC_USER_print			= BPF_FUNC_USER_START,
> > +	BPF_FUNC_USER_bpf_map_get_next_key,
> > +	BPF_FUNC_USER_bpf_map_lookup_elem,
> > +};
> > +
> > +#endif /* __BPF_USERFUNCS_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-userfuncs.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-userfuncs.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e920420237ee
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-userfuncs.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> > +#ifndef __BPF_USERFUNCS_H
> > +#define __BPF_USERFUNCS_H
> > +
> > +#include <bpf-userapi.h>
> > +
> > +static int (*bpfu_print)(const char *fmt, ...) =
> > +	(void *) BPF_FUNC_USER_print;
> > +static int (*bpfu_map_get_next_key)(void *map, void *key, void *value) =
> > +	(void *) BPF_FUNC_USER_bpf_map_get_next_key;
> > +static int (*bpfu_map_lookup_elem)(void *map, void *key, void *value) =
> > +	(void *) BPF_FUNC_USER_bpf_map_lookup_elem;
> > +
> > +#define print(fmt, ...)                                  \
> > +({                                                       \
> > +	char ____fmt[] = fmt;                            \
> > +	bpfu_print(____fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);              \
> > +})
> 
> since there is no verifier for this user space bpf interpreter
> there is no need to restrict what BEGIN/END progs can do and can call.
> llvm will happily compile any C code into bpf instructions.
> With little bit of elf magic it's possible to let it call any libc
> function instead of only 3 above.
> perf loader will see bpf_call into normal printf, memcpy, memcmp, etc
> then during the loading need to associate symbol with actual address
> of these functions inside perf binary and let call_cb do the call.
> I think this way begin/end will be much more powerful and useful.
> Potentially allowing some of the bcc scripts to be written this way.

Yeah, what is in perf right now, i.e. symbol resolution, rbtree, etc
provides a really nice lib for use in these scripts.

- Arnaldo