[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312191416.GB16666@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:14:16 +0100
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/35] syscalls: define goal to not call sys_xyzzy()
from within the kernel
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 03:24:01PM +0000, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Dominik Brodowski
> <linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The kernel should not use call syscalls (i.e., sys_xyzyyz()) directly.
> > + * Instead, use one of the following functions which work equivalent to
> > + * the syscall they are named for.
>
> "Instead, use one of the functions which work equivalently, e.g. do_xysyyz()"
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 08:27:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The previous sentence has a typo as well, should be:
>
> * Kernel code should not call syscalls (i.e., sys_xyzyyz()) directly.
Thanks for your feedback. Here's what I will do for v2, unless you find more
typos or areas for improvement:
/*
* Kernel code should not call syscalls (i.e., sys_xyzyyz()) directly.
* Instead, use one of the functions which work equivalently, such as
* the ksys_xyzyyz() functions prototyped below.
*/
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists