[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1520823814.922480963@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 03:03:34 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@...il.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Denys Vlasenko" <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...e.de>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 049/104] x86/alternatives: Guard NOPs optimization
3.2.101-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
commit 69df353ff305805fc16082d0c5bfa6e20fa8b863 upstream.
Take a look at the first instruction byte before optimizing the NOP -
there might be something else there already, like the ALTERNATIVE_2()
in rdtsc_barrier() which NOPs out on AMD even though we just
patched in an MFENCE.
This happens because the alternatives sees X86_FEATURE_MFENCE_RDTSC,
AMD CPUs set it, we patch in the MFENCE and right afterwards it sees
X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC which AMD CPUs don't set and we blindly
optimize the NOP.
Checking whether at least the first byte is 0x90 prevents that.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428181662-18020-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -323,6 +323,9 @@ done:
static void __init_or_module optimize_nops(struct alt_instr *a, u8 *instr)
{
+ if (instr[0] != 0x90)
+ return;
+
add_nops(instr + (a->instrlen - a->padlen), a->padlen);
DUMP_BYTES(instr, a->instrlen, "%p: [%d:%d) optimized NOPs: ",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists