lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:32:55 +0000
From:   Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
CC:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Yueyao Zhu <yueyao.zhu@...il.com>,
        Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Support Opensource" <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/7] typec: tcpm: Add sink side support for PPS

On 09 March 2018 17:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 03:50:48PM +0000, Adam Thomson wrote:
> > This patch set adds sink side support for the PPS feature introduced in the
> > USB PD 3.0 specification.
> >
> > The source PPS supply is represented using the Power Supply framework to provide
> > access and control APIs for dealing with it's operating voltage and current,
> > and switching between a standard PDO and PPS APDO operation. During standard
> PDO
> > operation the voltage and current is read-only, but for APDO PPS these are
> > writable as well to allow for control.
> >
> > It should be noted that the keepalive for PPS is not handled within TCPM. The
> > expectation is that the external user will be required to ensure re-requests
> > occur regularly to ensure PPS remains and the source does not hard reset.
> 
> I've applied the first 3 patches now.  Can you rebase and resend based
> on the feedback so far?

That's great. Thanks. Need to also rebase based on the patch
'Revert "typec: tcpm: Only request matching pdos"' as this impacts the APDO
selection logic. This is on my TODO list and will try and deal with it ASAP,
hopefully this week.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ