[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180312143212.77z2ptyqbsbqdll3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:32:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
luto@...capital.net, keescook@...omium.org, willy@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, jgross@...e.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/boot/compressed/64: Describe the logic behind
the LA57 check
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> > We can of course bike shed / benchmark this once my desktop refresh
> > sports this feature, but ISTR this being one of the very first things
> > Ingo mentioned when we started this whole 5L thing.
>
> I would rather not fix the problem that may not actually exist. :)
That 5 level pagetables involve more overhead is a realy problem.
By default we should only enable 5-level paging if memory mappings exist in
the memory map that require the extended physical memory space.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists