linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1520869285.3469.13.camel@wdc.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:41:26 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To:     "steve@....org" <steve@....org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hare@...e.com" <hare@...e.com>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_handler: remove VLAs

On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 14:14 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> The two patches I sent were supposed to be alternative solutions; see
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=152063671005295&w=2 for the introduction (I
> seem to have messed up the headers, so the mails didn’t end up threaded
> properly).

The two patches arrived in my inbox several minutes before the cover letter. In
the e-mail header of the cover letter I found the following:

X-Greylist: delayed 1810 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 18:05:08 EST

Does this mean that the delay happened due to vger server's anti-spam algorithm?

Bart.