linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH ghak21 4/4] audit: add parent of refused symlink to audit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSkd==VKfnBLpVra1V8FNXD-V9HZv07UyFU=EZLaQ5CdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:47:58 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak21 4/4] audit: add parent of refused symlink to audit_names

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 2018-03-08 19:50, Paul Moore wrote:

...

>> (Point #2 is why I didn't merge patch 3/4, just include it in this
>> revised patch)
>
> On reviewing this, I'm not totally convinced the parent record is
> necessary to fully understand what happenned since there is a CWD
> record.  I left 3 and 4 as seperate patches in case it is found that
> only 3 is necessary.

You need to figure this out and decide what is necessary.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com