[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180313152458.875947864@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:23:34 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 011/140] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: fix lock imbalance
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
commit de526f401284e1638d4c97cb5a4c292ac3f37655 upstream.
syszkaller found that rcu was not held in hashlimit_mt_common()
We only need to enable BH at this point.
Fixes: bea74641e378 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: add rate match mode")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.c
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ hashlimit_mt_common(const struct sk_buff
if (!dh->rateinfo.prev_window &&
(dh->rateinfo.current_rate <= dh->rateinfo.burst)) {
spin_unlock(&dh->lock);
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ local_bh_enable();
return !(cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_INVERT);
} else {
goto overlimit;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists