[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180313165208.07EFA60A24@smtp.codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:52:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] rsi: Remove stack VLA usage
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> The kernel would like to have all stack VLA usage removed[1]. rsi uses
> a VLA based on 'blksize'. Elsewhere in the SDIO code maximum block size
> is defined using a magic number. We can use a pre-processor defined
> constant and declare the array to maximum size. We add a check before
> accessing the array in case of programmer error.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc>
There were conflicts. Can you rebase on top of wireless-drivers-next and
resend, please?
Recorded preimage for 'drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c'
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Applying: rsi: Remove stack VLA usage
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c
M drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_sdio.c
Auto-merging drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_91x_hal.c
Patch failed at 0001 rsi: Remove stack VLA usage
The copy of the patch that failed is found in: .git/rebase-apply/patch
Patch set to Changes Requested.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10274983/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists