[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180313183220.GA21538@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:32:20 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add kvmalloc_ab_c and kvzalloc_struct
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:19:51PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > Thanks. So it's OK to replace kmalloc and kzalloc, even though they
> > > didn't previously consider vmalloc and even though kmalloc doesn't zero?
> >
> > We'll also need to replace the corresponding places where those structs
> > are freed with kvfree(). Can coccinelle handle that too?
>
> Is the use of vmalloc a necessary part of the design? Or could there be a
> non vmalloc versions for call sites that are already ok with that?
We can also add kmalloc_struct() along with kmalloc_ab_c that won't fall
back to vmalloc but just return NULL.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists