linux-kernel - Re: Regression from efi: call get_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9_rYv_XocRwTLdH+P7dVq+3=CQRJ9O9kKyry_=Ekz0aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:59:33 +0000
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>,
        Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression from efi: call get_event_log before ExitBootServices

On 13 March 2018 at 07:47, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 12-03-18 20:55, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
>>
...
>>
>> Hans, you said you configured the tablet to use the 32-bit version of grub
>> instead
>> of 64. Why's that?
>
>
> Because this tablet, like (almost?) all Bay Trail hardware has a 32 bit
> UEFI,
> even though the processor is 64 bit capable (AFAIK 64 bit Windows drivers
> were
> not ready in time so all Bay Trail devices shipped with a 32 bit Windows).
>
> So this is running a 32 bit grub which boots a 64 bit kernel.
>
>> Jeremy, could you confirm if you are building the kernel in 64bit mode? Is
>> your Android install working? (that is, what happens if you boot
>> Boot0000)?
>
>
> AFAIK the kernel on Jeremy's tablet (which I initially installed) is 64 bit.
>
> Could the problem perhaps be that the new code for the TPM event-log is
> missing some handling to deal with running on a 32 bit firmware? I know the
> rest of the kernel has special code to deal with this.
>

That is a very good point, and I missed that this is a 64-bit kernel
running on 32-bit UEFI.

The TPM code does use efi_call_proto() directly, and now I am thinking
it is perhaps the allocate_pages() call that simply only initializes
the low 32-bits of log_tbl.

Jeremy, could you please try initializing tcg2_protocol and log_tbl to
NULL at the start of the function?