[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08950833-d199-fd2b-06f6-9e585c183b86@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 21:58:21 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] nvme-pci: Use PCI p2pmem subsystem to manage the
CMB
On 3/12/2018 9:55 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 3/12/2018 3:35 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> - if (nvmeq->sq_cmds_io)
>
> I think you should keep the code as it is for the case where
> (!nvmeq->sq_cmds_is_io && nvmeq->sq_cmds_io)
Never mind. I misunderstood the code.
>
> You are changing the behavior for NVMe drives with CMB buffers.
> You can change the if statement here with the statement above.
>
>> - memcpy_toio(&nvmeq->sq_cmds_io[tail], cmd, sizeof(*cmd));
>> - else
>> - memcpy(&nvmeq->sq_cmds[tail], cmd, sizeof(*cmd));
>> + memcpy(&nvmeq->sq_cmds[tail], cmd, sizeof(*cmd));
>>
>
>
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists