lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <010001621f97c0bb-898ceaeb-668d-4543-8835-dc374ba02539-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:41:02 +0000
From:   Jeremy Cline <jeremy@...ine.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Thiebaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression from efi: call get_event_log before ExitBootServices

On 03/13/2018 03:59 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 March 2018 at 07:47, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 12-03-18 20:55, Thiebaud Weksteen wrote:
>>>
> ...
>>>
>>> Hans, you said you configured the tablet to use the 32-bit version of grub
>>> instead
>>> of 64. Why's that?
>>
>>
>> Because this tablet, like (almost?) all Bay Trail hardware has a 32 bit
>> UEFI,
>> even though the processor is 64 bit capable (AFAIK 64 bit Windows drivers
>> were
>> not ready in time so all Bay Trail devices shipped with a 32 bit Windows).
>>
>> So this is running a 32 bit grub which boots a 64 bit kernel.
>>
>>> Jeremy, could you confirm if you are building the kernel in 64bit mode? Is
>>> your Android install working? (that is, what happens if you boot
>>> Boot0000)?
>>
>>
>> AFAIK the kernel on Jeremy's tablet (which I initially installed) is 64 bit.
>>
>> Could the problem perhaps be that the new code for the TPM event-log is
>> missing some handling to deal with running on a 32 bit firmware? I know the
>> rest of the kernel has special code to deal with this.
>>
> 
> That is a very good point, and I missed that this is a 64-bit kernel
> running on 32-bit UEFI.
> 
> The TPM code does use efi_call_proto() directly, and now I am thinking
> it is perhaps the allocate_pages() call that simply only initializes
> the low 32-bits of log_tbl.
> 
> Jeremy, could you please try initializing tcg2_protocol and log_tbl to
> NULL at the start of the function?
> 

That was it, it boots when those are initialized to NULL.

Regards,
Jeremy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ