[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH2r5mvmiTaC4W=LAaOvWv6xGEMce957c+u+Af6wNgxudbO3_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:21:45 -0500
From: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>,
Thomas Backlund <tmb@...eia.org>,
Aurélien Aptel <aaptel@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
Pavel Shilovskiy <pshilov@...rosoft.com>,
CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 28/43] SMB3: Validate negotiate request must always
be signed
There will be a fix needed to correct an oops in calc_signature,
besides the easy patch (smb3 validate negotiate patch).
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:21 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 07:37:55PM -0700, Steve French wrote:
>> Just got a wireshark trace - this is a fairly trivial issue (missing
>> the validate negotiate must be signed patch) - I had some trouble
>> getting this version of the kernel running (unrelated issue) and on
>> systems with access to Windows 2016...
>
> Ok, I have no idea what this means, or what I should do here because of
> it :(
>
> Any hints for what to do with the stable tree?
>
> totally confused,
>
> greg k-h
--
Thanks,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists