[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3619597.KITkZyk1Wv@blindfold>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 20:25:25 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
dedekind1@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: ubi: use put_device() if device_register fail
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2018, 19:56:52 CET schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 16:20:49 +0530
>
> Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com> wrote:
> > if device_register() returned an error! Always use put_device()
> > to give up the reference initialized.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > index 3fd8d7f..db85b68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > @@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ int ubi_add_volume(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct
> > ubi_volume *vol)>
> > return err;
> >
> > out_cdev:
> > + put_device(&vol->dev);
> >
> > cdev_del(&vol->cdev);
>
> use-after-free bug here: put_device() has freed the vol obj, and you're
> dereferencing the pointer just after that.
eeek, thanks for looking at more context.
Arvind, while you are right that put_device() is missing, please double check
that freeing the devices is also correct.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists