[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180314203645.GA21437@light.dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:36:45 +0100
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Tautschnig, Michael" <tautschn@...zon.co.uk>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sigreturn: use SYSCALL_DEFINE0
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018, Tautschnig, Michael wrote:
>
> > All definitions of syscalls in x86 except for those patched here have
> > already been using the appropriate SYSCALL_DEFINE*.
>
> Dominik, do you have more urgent stuff queued in that area?
>
> If yes, please add: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> If not, I simply route it through x86/urgent for 4.16.
Thanks for asking! Nothing urgent from my side, only stuff for 4.17, so it
would be great if you could route it through x86/urgent.
Thanks,
Dominik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists