linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] selftests/x86/entry_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a16270b5cfe7832d6d00c479d0f871066cbdb52b.1521003603.git.luto@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:03:11 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
        bartoldeman@...il.com, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86: Add test cases for POPF

POPF is currently broken -- add tests to catch the error.  This
results in:

   [RUN]	POPF with VIP set and IF clear from vm86 mode
   [INFO]	Exited vm86 mode due to STI
   [FAIL]	Incorrect return reason (started at eip = 0xd, ended at eip = 0xf)

because POPF currently fails to check IF before reporting a pending
interrupt.

This patch also makes the FAIL message a bit more informative.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Bart Oldeman <bartoldeman@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
index 6e85f0d0498d..ade443a88421 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -95,6 +95,10 @@ asm (
 	"int3\n\t"
 	"vmcode_int80:\n\t"
 	"int $0x80\n\t"
+	"vmcode_popf_hlt:\n\t"
+	"push %ax\n\t"
+	"popf\n\t"
+	"hlt\n\t"
 	"vmcode_umip:\n\t"
 	/* addressing via displacements */
 	"smsw (2052)\n\t"
@@ -124,8 +128,8 @@ asm (
 
 extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
 extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
-	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[],
-	vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
+	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_popf_hlt[],
+	vmcode_umip[], vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
 
 /* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
 static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
@@ -175,7 +179,7 @@ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
 	    (VM86_TYPE(ret) == rettype && VM86_ARG(ret) == retarg)) {
 		printf("[OK]\tReturned correctly\n");
 	} else {
-		printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason\n");
+		printf("[FAIL]\tIncorrect return reason (started at eip = 0x%lx, ended at eip = 0x%lx)\n", eip, v86->regs.eip);
 		nerrs++;
 	}
 
@@ -264,6 +268,9 @@ int main(void)
 	v86.regs.ds = load_addr / 16;
 	v86.regs.es = load_addr / 16;
 
+	/* Use the end of the page as our stack. */
+	v86.regs.esp = 4096;
+
 	assert((v86.regs.cs & 3) == 0);	/* Looks like RPL = 0 */
 
 	/* #BR -- should deliver SIG??? */
@@ -295,6 +302,23 @@ int main(void)
 	v86.regs.eflags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_IF;
 	do_test(&v86, vmcode_sti - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "STI with VIP set");
 
+	/* POPF with VIP set but IF clear: should not trap */
+	v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
+	v86.regs.eax = 0;
+	do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP set and IF clear");
+
+	/* POPF with VIP set and IF set: should trap */
+	v86.regs.eflags = X86_EFLAGS_VIP;
+	v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
+	do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_STI, 0, "POPF with VIP and IF set");
+
+	/* POPF with VIP clear and IF set: should not trap */
+	v86.regs.eflags = 0;
+	v86.regs.eax = X86_EFLAGS_IF;
+	do_test(&v86, vmcode_popf_hlt - vmcode, VM86_UNKNOWN, 0, "POPF with VIP clear and IF set");
+
+	v86.regs.eflags = 0;
+
 	/* INT3 -- should cause #BP */
 	do_test(&v86, vmcode_int3 - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "INT3");
 
-- 
2.14.3