linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/amd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e43c5e45-77e8-df20-ee90-1ac5cc3ad288@amd.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:23:40 -0500
From:   Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu/amd - Add debugfs support

On 03/14/2018 10:29 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com> wrote:
>> On 03/13/2018 03:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
>>>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> 
>>>>> Keep in order?
> 
>>>> What order would that be? These few needed files are listed in the same
>>>> order as which they appear in amd_iommu.c. I'm gonna need a preference
>>>> spelled out, please (and a rationale, so I may better understand).
> 
>>> To increase readability and avoid potential header duplication (here
>>> is can bus protocol implementation where the problem exists for real,
>>> even in new code!)
> 
>> With all due respect, I don't find that you clearly answered my question.
> 
> Alphabetical order I meant.

Thank you very much.

Gary