linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the syscalls tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:44:30 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jesper Nilsson <jesper@....nu>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the asm-generic tree with the syscalls
 tree

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the asm-generic tree got a conflict in:

  arch/cris/kernel/sys_cris.c

between commit:

  17b923b234ed ("mm: add ksys_mmap_pgoff() helper; remove in-kernel calls to sys_mmap_pgoff()")

from the syscalls tree and commit:

  77b0b77f7812 ("CRIS: Drop support for the CRIS port")

from the asm-generic tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped