[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1521018450.20980.220.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:07:30 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online
CPUs as far as possible
On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 12:11 +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > At 03/13/2018 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Artem Bityutskiy
> > > > Longer term, yeah, I agree. Kernel's notion of possible CPU
> > > > count
> > > > should be realistic.
> >
> > I did a patch for that, Artem, could you help me to test it.
> >
>
> I didn't consider the nr_cpu_ids before. please ignore the old patch
> and
> try the following RFC patch.
Sure I can help with testing a patch, could we please:
1. Start a new thread for this
2. Include ACPI forum/folks
Thanks,
Artem.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists