[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269750b-5190-a167-8d34-91794e6d0a8c@micronovasrl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:16:32 +0100
From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i-h3: Add Mali node
Hi,
Il 14/03/2018 09:05, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:16:45AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> The H3 has an ARM Mali 400 GPU, so add binding to our DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>
> How was this tested?
I wanted you asked me about this to ask you:
if I can't test it on HW, but others tested it all around,
for example using this patch:
https://github.com/armbian/build/blob/master/patch/kernel/sunxi-next/32-h3-DT-add-mali-node.patch
Is it enough? Or do I have to test it directly?
Or maybe I can invite those people to tag this patch as tested-by ?
>
> Is there any specific reason not to share it with the H5?
Yes, H5 has dual GPU but quad PP and on IRQ you can clearly see:
- GPU_GP
- GPU_GPMMU
- GPU_PMU
- GPU_PP
- GPU_PP0
- GPU_PPMMU0
- GPU_PP1
- GPU_PPMMU1
- GPU_PP2
- GPU_PPMMU2
- GPU_PP3
- GPU_PPMMU3
So I think they should be placed in specific dts files.
What do you think?
Thanks
>
> Maxime
>
--
Giulio Benetti
CTO
MICRONOVA SRL
Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD)
Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346
Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285
Capitale Sociale € 26.000 i.v.
Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285
Numero R.E.A. 258642
Powered by blists - more mailing lists