[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <152102825828.13166.9574628787314078889.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:51:48 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: Allow to kill tasks doing pcpu_alloc() and waiting
for pcpu_balance_workfn()
In case of memory deficit and low percpu memory pages,
pcpu_balance_workfn() takes pcpu_alloc_mutex for a long
time (as it makes memory allocations itself and waits
for memory reclaim). If tasks doing pcpu_alloc() are
choosen by OOM killer, they can't exit, because they
are waiting for the mutex.
The patch makes pcpu_alloc() to care about killing signal
and use mutex_lock_killable(), when it's allowed by GFP
flags. This guarantees, a task does not miss SIGKILL
from OOM killer.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
mm/percpu.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 50e7fdf84055..212b4988926c 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1369,8 +1369,12 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved,
return NULL;
}
- if (!is_atomic)
- mutex_lock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
+ if (!is_atomic) {
+ if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)
+ mutex_lock(&pcpu_alloc_mutex);
+ else if (mutex_lock_killable(&pcpu_alloc_mutex))
+ return NULL;
+ }
spin_lock_irqsave(&pcpu_lock, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists