linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: ctr: avoid VLA use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:46:29 +0100
From:   Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
To:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ctr: avoid VLA use

2018-03-14 14:31 GMT+01:00 Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2018, 14:17:30 CET schrieb Salvatore Mesoraca:
>
> Hi Salvatore,
>
>>       if (walk.nbytes) {
>> -             crypto_ctr_crypt_final(&walk, child);
>> -             err = blkcipher_walk_done(desc, &walk, 0);
>> +             err = crypto_ctr_crypt_final(&walk, child);
>> +             err = blkcipher_walk_done(desc, &walk, err);
>
> I guess you either want to handle the error from crypto_ctr_crypt_final or do
> an err |= blkcipher_walk_done.

I think that blkcipher_walk_done handles and returns the error for me.
Am I wrong?

Best regards,

Salvatore