[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM3PR04MB07433547BF2FEB36282A176BE6D10@AM3PR04MB0743.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:30:49 +0000
From: Razvan Stefanescu <razvan.stefanescu@....com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
"stuyoder@...il.com" <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/6] staging: fsl-dpaa2/ethsw: Add APIs for DPSW object
>
> Can you resend this series and just use the correct SPDX identifiers for
> all of the new files, instead of all of this horrid boiler-plate code?
>
> That will save me time when I have to go delete all of this in the near
> future :)
>
> Also, why dual license it? Are you _SURE_ you want to do that, and are
> totally aware of all of the crazy issues surrounding it? Hint, it
> almost never means what you might think it does, and I have yet to know
> of anyone doing anything "real" with any dual-licensed Linux kernel
> code.
>
> Remember, BSD is not the license you want/need for GPL header files that
> are exposed to userspace...
>
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thank you for your observation. I will update the patches with the SPDX identifiers.
Razvan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists