linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/16] mm: remove obsolete alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0cd8068e-1e57-e1a8-474e-f1ea9a179ac2@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:59:57 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] mm: remove obsolete alloc_remap()



On 03/14/2018 10:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Pavel Tatashin
> <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> I like this cleanup, but arch/tile (which is afaik Orphaned but still in the gate) has:
>>
>> HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_REMAP set to yes:
>>
>> arch/tile/Kconfig
>>  config HAVE_ARCH_ALLOC_REMAP
>>          def_bool y
> 
> It was a bit tricky to juggle the Cc lists here, but tile is removed
> in patch 06/10
> now. As I explained in the cover letter, it was originally planned to be marked
> deprecated for a while first, but after some more discussion, nobody could come
> up with a reason to keep it any longer. Same thing for mn10300,
> blackfin and cris.
> 

I see, thank you:

Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>