[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdOaE-efzbQV=Mtf+a1-6L5JxF10Uc+uZ+LYz3S757biw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:41:27 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" <desnesn@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, ruscur@...sell.cc,
aik@...abs.ru, david@...son.dropbear.id.au,
fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2, pci] pci: Addition of PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN
attribute to the PCI subsystem
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario
<desnesn@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN to pci_dev_flags and use it to
> silent PCI realignment messages if the flag is turned on by a driver.
It doesn't explain "Why?"
Why the driver needs that?
Another approach is to increase level of the message. Would it be
accepted by you (in case Bjorn agrees)?
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10),
> /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */
> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11),
> + /* Silent PCI resource realignment messages */
> + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 12),
I would rather name it _NO_PCI_REALIGN_MSG
> };
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists