[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0zyzZkH43oW5mMEX5QDm1RdRWMgtjPprFK9iRrNpy5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:30:58 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 30/36] fs: add do_linkat() helper and ksys_link()
wrapper; remove in-kernel calls to syscall
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Dominik Brodowski
<linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
>
> */
> -SYSCALL_DEFINE5(linkat, int, olddfd, const char __user *, oldname,
> - int, newdfd, const char __user *, newname, int, flags)
> +int do_linkat(int olddfd, const char __user *oldname, int newdfd,
> + const char __user *newname, int flags)
> {
> struct dentry *new_dentry;
> struct path old_path, new_path;
For consistency with other do_*() functions, I think it would be nice
to make this one not take a __user pointer either. However, I
have no idea how to do that without making the common case worse.
> --- a/init/initramfs.c
> +++ b/init/initramfs.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static int __init maybe_link(void)
> if (nlink >= 2) {
> char *old = find_link(major, minor, ino, mode, collected);
> if (old)
> - return (sys_link(old, collected) < 0) ? -1 : 1;
> + return (ksys_link(old, collected) < 0) ? -1 : 1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
Since this is the only caller outside of fs/namei.c, maybe it can be
changed to use vfs_link() instead? That might still be a larger rework
than you want to do.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists