[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f0bd797-64d4-ae96-00ae-5e11cf74d28e@grandegger.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 07:58:35 +0100
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To: Jakob Unterwurzacher <jakob.unterwurzacher@...obroma-systems.com>
Cc: Martin Elshuber <martin.elshuber@...obroma-systems.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] can: ucan: add driver for Theobroma Systems UCAN
devices
Am 14.03.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Jakob Unterwurzacher:
> On 14.03.18 11:04, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> (000.000443) can0 20000034 [8] 00 0C 00 00 00 00 78 00
>>>> ERRORFRAME
>>>> controller-problem{rx-error-warning,tx-error-warning}
>>>> transceiver-status
>>>> no-acknowledgement-on-tx
>>>> error-counter-tx-rx{{120}{0}}
>>>> (000.000444) can0 20000034 [8] 00 3C 00 00 00 00 80 00
>>>> ERRORFRAME
>>>>
>>>> controller-problem{rx-error-warning,tx-error-warning,rx-error-passive,tx-error-passive}
>>
>>
>> Just,
>>
>> controller-problem{rx-error-passive,tx-error-passive} [...]
>>
>> Back to error active is missing!?
>
> That was indeed missing. We have fixed the missing back-to-error-active
> in our firmware.
>
> Also, we no longer send the controller status in every error frame, but
> only on state changes (see below) which seems to be how other drivers
> are handling things.
Good, it would also be useful, if berr-reporting could be enabled by the
firmware. This avoids a lot of traffic and load, especially if no cable
is connected.
Wolfgang.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists