[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b67f0624a9643f73a86126f4c6f18657@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:24:03 +0530
From: poza@...eaurora.org
To: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>,
Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/DPC: Fix PCI legacy interrupt acknowledgement
On 2018-03-15 02:22, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 09:20:48PM +0530, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> Current DPC driver acknowledges the interrupt in deferred work, which
>> works
>> since MSI are edge triggered.
>>
>> But when MSI is disabled (e.g. pci=nomsi boot option) port service
>> driver falls back to PCI legacy INT interrupt.
>>
>> With current code we do not acknowledge the interrupt back in
>> dpc_irq()
>> and we get dpc interrupt storm.
>>
>> This patch acknowledges the interrupt in interrupt handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>
>
> Thanks, this looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith
checkpatch script shows
WARNING: 'acknowledgement' may be misspelled - perhaps 'acknowledgment'?
but dictionaries shows acknowledgement.
Regards,
Oza.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists