[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vadxbnwe.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:04:33 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] staging: add drivers to support Mediatek mt7621 in gnubee-pc1
On Thu, Mar 15 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This all seems fine. Generally the requirements for staging are that it
> has a TODO, someone to work on it, and it doesn't break the build. But
> some of the patches don't have commit message and those are required and
> some of the commit messages are just the changes you have made not don't
> describe the actual code...
Thanks for having a look.
It seems odd to require detailed commit messages, when we don't require
the same level of quality in the code.
Naturally when the driver is moved out of staging a properly detailed
commit message should be added, but is that needed on the way in to
staging? At this stage I don't know much more than is already there.
After I've cleaned up the code I probably will.
For patch 01/13 you asked "what kind of device this is". The subject
line makes it clear that it is a "pcie driver". What extra detail did
you want? Would it be sufficient to just copy the subject line so that
it appears twice in the commit message?
>
> John Crispin's email is john@...ozen.org.
Thanks.
NeilBrown
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists