linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Major code reorganization to make all i2c transfers working

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14ad40fa8443f443326601695d711b77@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:16:04 +0530
From:   Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>
To:     "Christ, Austin" <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Major code reorganization to make all i2c
 transfers working

On 2018-03-14 03:42, Christ, Austin wrote:
> Sorry for the miscommunication. I reviewed the patches and tested them
> on the Centriq 2400 platform.
> 
> Perhaps the following is the most appropriate.
> 
> Acked-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
> 

  Thanks Austin for reviewing and testing the code changes.

  It would be more helpful if you provide your 'Tested-by'
  for last 2 changes. Sricharan has already given 'Reviewed-by'
  for last 2 major changes and your 'Tested-by' will help
  in confirming that these changes are working fine in
  other platforms also.

  Thanks,
  Abhishek

> 
> On 3/13/2018 3:17 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:09:00PM -0600, Christ, Austin wrote:
>>> I've tested this v2 series on Centriq 2400. Looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> Reviewed-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@...eaurora.org>
>> 
>> I am a little confused. Do you mean Tested-by or Reviewed-by?
>>