[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b50f5d8-97a6-2442-34bb-2782c35505fd@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:04:52 +0100
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Reduce object size of DRM_ERROR and DRM_DEBUG uses
Op 15-03-18 om 14:30 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:02:15PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> drm_printk is used for both DRM_ERROR and DRM_DEBUG with unnecessary
>> arguments that can be removed by creating separate functins.
>>
>> Create specific functions for these calls to reduce x86/64 defconfig
>> size by ~20k.
>>
>> Modify the existing macros to use the specific calls.
>>
>> new:
>> $ size -t drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.a | tail -1
>> 1876562 44542 995 1922099 1d5433 (TOTALS)
>>
>> old:
>> $ size -t drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.a | tail -1
>> 1897565 44542 995 1943102 1da63e (TOTALS)
>>
>> Miscellanea:
>>
>> o intel_display requires a change to use the specific calls.
> How much would we lose if we move the (drm_debug&FOO) outside the
> functions again? I'm somewhat concerned about all the function call
> overhead when debugs aren't even enabled.
Upstream:
text data bss dec hex filename
377143 5689 4352 387184 5e870 drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko
With this patch:
373831 5689 4352 383872 5db80 drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko
Moving the if outside (below):
377629 5689 4352 387670 5ea56 drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko
Bye savings..
I don't think there are any places in which the debug output is performance sensitive,
so I'm ok with not inlining.
---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
index 79abf6d5b4db..928822403a59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c
@@ -89,14 +89,11 @@ void drm_dev_printk(const struct device *dev, const char *level,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_printk);
-void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...)
+void __drm_dbg(const char *format, ...)
{
struct va_format vaf;
va_list args;
- if (!(drm_debug & category))
- return;
-
va_start(args, format);
vaf.fmt = format;
vaf.va = &args;
@@ -106,7 +103,7 @@ void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...)
va_end(args);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dbg);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_dbg);
void drm_err(const char *format, ...)
{
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h
index 3a40c5a3a5fa..2a145b97bdfc 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_print.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h
@@ -200,8 +200,17 @@ __printf(6, 7)
void drm_dev_printk(const struct device *dev, const char *level,
unsigned int category, const char *function_name,
const char *prefix, const char *format, ...);
-__printf(2, 3)
-void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...);
+
+__printf(1, 2)
+void __drm_dbg(const char *format, ...);
+
+
+#define drm_dbg(category, format, ...) \
+ do { \
+ if (drm_debug & category) \
+ __drm_dbg(format, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
+ } while (0)
+
__printf(1, 2)
void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists