linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: dts: uniphier: UniPhier DT updates for v4.17

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a17ONgh=xq2K5e166hVjm7f9Z0PV9pXp7PSzO1c7vR6nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:00:59 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: dts: uniphier: UniPhier DT updates for v4.17

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Olof,
>
> Please pull UniPhier DT updates for v4.17.
>
> Note:
> In this development cycle, I ended up with putting all of arm/arm64 changes
> into a single pull request.
> This is because some DTSI files are shared across arches.
> So, I needed to do this to avoid build errors.

Ok, no problem. We generally prefer split pull requests, but that is
indeed a good reason to keep a single one.

Pulled into next/dt, thanks!

       Arnd