[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180315150747.31945-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:07:47 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/thp: Do not wait for lock_page() in deferred_split_scan()
deferred_split_scan() gets called from reclaim path. Waiting for page
lock may lead to deadlock there.
Replace lock_page() with trylock_page() and skip the page if we failed
to lock it. We will get to the page on the next scan.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 87ab9b8f56b5..529cf36b7edb 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -2783,11 +2783,13 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
list_for_each_safe(pos, next, &list) {
page = list_entry((void *)pos, struct page, mapping);
- lock_page(page);
+ if (!trylock_page(page))
+ goto next;
/* split_huge_page() removes page from list on success */
if (!split_huge_page(page))
split++;
unlock_page(page);
+next:
put_page(page);
}
--
2.16.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists