linux-kernel - [PATCH] [v3] gpu: ipu-v3: prg: avoid possible array underflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180315162011.807909-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 17:19:57 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Tobias Jordan <Tobias.Jordan@...ktrobit.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [v3] gpu: ipu-v3: prg: avoid possible array underflow

gcc-8 reports that we access an array with a negative index
in an error case:

drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c: In function 'ipu_prg_channel_disable':
drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c:252:43: error: array subscript -22 is below array bounds of 'struct ipu_prg_channel[3]' [-Werror=array-bounds]

This moves the range check in front of the first time that
variable gets used.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
----
v1: Originally sent on Dec 4, 2017.
v2: Sent again on Jan 16, after no reply, Phillipp said it was merged
v3: Ran into a related problem with CONFIG_UBSAN, sent again fixing both
---
 drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c
index 97b99500153d..83f9dd934a5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-prg.c
@@ -250,10 +250,14 @@ void ipu_prg_channel_disable(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan)
 {
 	int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num);
 	struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv;
-	struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+	struct ipu_prg_channel *chan;
 	u32 val;
 
-	if (!chan->enabled || prg_chan < 0)
+	if (prg_chan < 0)
+		return;
+
+	chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+	if (!chan->enabled)
 		return;
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(prg->dev);
@@ -280,13 +284,15 @@ int ipu_prg_channel_configure(struct ipuv3_channel *ipu_chan,
 {
 	int prg_chan = ipu_prg_ipu_to_prg_chan(ipu_chan->num);
 	struct ipu_prg *prg = ipu_chan->ipu->prg_priv;
-	struct ipu_prg_channel *chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+	struct ipu_prg_channel *chan;
 	u32 val;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (prg_chan < 0)
 		return prg_chan;
 
+	chan = &prg->chan[prg_chan];
+
 	if (chan->enabled) {
 		ipu_pre_update(prg->pres[chan->used_pre], *eba);
 		return 0;
-- 
2.9.0