[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95c1590a-1645-ce0e-dea3-d8927bc97704@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:00:39 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>, <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI / processor: Get accurate possible CPU count
Hi Andy,
At 03/15/2018 01:24 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> +static void __init acpi_update_possible_map(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int cpu, nr = 0;
>> +
>
>> + if (nr_cpu_ids <= nr_unique_ids)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (nr >= nr_unique_ids)
>> + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
>> + nr++;
>> + }
>
> IIUC this can be optimized to:
>
Yes, I agree, It's smarter and clearer. Will use it.
Thanks,
dou
> if (nr_unique_ids >= nr_cpu_ids)
> return;
>
> /* Don't yet figure out if it's superfluous */
> if (nr_unique_ids >= cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask))
> return;
>
> for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpu_possible_mask, nr_unique_ids)
> set_cpu_possible(cpu, false);
>
>> + nr_cpu_ids = nr_unique_ids;
>> + pr_info("Allowing %d possible CPUs\n", nr_cpu_ids);
>> +}
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists