[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1521134981.5348.62.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:29:41 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@...com>,
Jiandi An <anjiandi@...eaurora.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: "dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: Fix IMA Kconfig for dependencies on ARM64
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 13:14 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 12:19 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > If EFI is extending the TPM, will the events be added to the TPM
> > > event log or to the IMA measurement list?
> >
> > I'm not proposing any changes to the tpm_pcr_extend API. At the
> > moment it does an extend without logging, so that's what it will do
> > in the EFI driver case as well. That means logging is still the
> > responsibility of the caller.
>
> Does EFI support extending multiple TPM banks?
The specs are here:
https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/tcg-efi-protocol-specification/
As I said, I'm not planning to change the tpm_pcr_.. API. At the
moment for a TPM2 we extend all banks in the tpm_pcr_extend() API, so
that's what we'll continue to do ... including extending the sha256
banks with the sha1 hash, which seems to be our current practice.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists