lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFypsiFknaNaWQP8rRacNiZLW8sEfU150L0uHF_t8=-3UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:46:45 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     kemi <kemi.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:33 AM, kemi <kemi.wang@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi, Jeff
>    Today, I deleted the previous kernel images for commit 3da90b159b146672f830bcd2489dd3a1f4e9e089
> and commit c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1660b8f0ba43ed58426e, respectively. And, re-run the same aim7
> jobs for three times for each commit. The aim7 score between two commit does not have obvious difference.
>
> Perhaps something weird happen when compiling kernel. Please ignore this report, apologize for the bother.

Ok, I'm not entirely happy with how random this was, but that commit
never looked like a remotely likely culprit, so I think we'll just
chalk it up to bad luck and unknown effects.

                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ