[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180316152321.040192570@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:23:17 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+e783f671527912cd9403@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 54/86] netfilter: add back stackpointer size checks
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
commit 57ebd808a97d7c5b1e1afb937c2db22beba3c1f8 upstream.
The rationale for removing the check is only correct for rulesets
generated by ip(6)tables.
In iptables, a jump can only occur to a user-defined chain, i.e.
because we size the stack based on number of user-defined chains we
cannot exceed stack size.
However, the underlying binary format has no such restriction,
and the validation step only ensures that the jump target is a
valid rule start point.
IOW, its possible to build a rule blob that has no user-defined
chains but does contain a jump.
If this happens, no jump stack gets allocated and crash occurs
because no jumpstack was allocated.
Fixes: 7814b6ec6d0d6 ("netfilter: xtables: don't save/restore jumpstack offset")
Reported-by: syzbot+e783f671527912cd9403@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 7 ++++++-
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -261,6 +261,10 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buf
}
if (table_base + v
!= arpt_next_entry(e)) {
+ if (unlikely(stackidx >= private->stacksize)) {
+ verdict = NF_DROP;
+ break;
+ }
jumpstack[stackidx++] = e;
}
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -345,8 +345,13 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
continue;
}
if (table_base + v != ipt_next_entry(e) &&
- !(e->ip.flags & IPT_F_GOTO))
+ !(e->ip.flags & IPT_F_GOTO)) {
+ if (unlikely(stackidx >= private->stacksize)) {
+ verdict = NF_DROP;
+ break;
+ }
jumpstack[stackidx++] = e;
+ }
e = get_entry(table_base, v);
continue;
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -376,6 +376,10 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
if (table_base + v != ip6t_next_entry(e) &&
!(e->ipv6.flags & IP6T_F_GOTO)) {
+ if (unlikely(stackidx >= private->stacksize)) {
+ verdict = NF_DROP;
+ break;
+ }
jumpstack[stackidx++] = e;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists