[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <KL1P15301MB00064DA6B4D221123B5241CFBFD70@KL1P15301MB0006.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:41:27 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org"
<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
"Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: hv: Remove hbus->enum_sem
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 03:54
> ...
> Dexuan,
> while applying/updating these patches I notice this one may be squashed
> into: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/886266/
>
> since they logically belong in the same patch. Are you OK with me doing
> that ? Is my reading correct ?
> Lorenzo
I'm OK.
I used two patches
[PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: hv: Serialize the present and eject work items
[PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: hv: Remove hbus->enum_sem
only because the first fixed a real issue and hence IMO should go into
stable kernels, and the second is only a cleanup patch, which doesn't
need go into stable kernels.
Either way is ok to me.
Please feel free to do whatever you think is better. :-)
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists