[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180316040824.21472-8-rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:38:24 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, sboyd@...nel.org, andy.gross@...aro.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] soc: qcom: rpmpd: Add a max vote on all corners at init
As we move from no clients/consumers in kernel voting on corners,
to *some* voting and some not voting, we might end up in a situation
where the clients which remove votes can adversly impact others
who still don't have a way to vote.
To avoid this situation, have a max vote on all corners at init.
This should/can be removed once we have all clients moved to
be able to vote/unvote for themselves.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
index 4058c5b450c6..ebdcf9398441 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
@@ -304,6 +304,15 @@ static int rpmpd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_genpd_init(&rpmpds[i]->pd, NULL, true);
data->domains[i] = &rpmpds[i]->pd;
+
+ /*
+ * Until we have all consumers voting on corners
+ * just vote the max corner on all PDs
+ * This should ideally be *removed* once we have
+ * all (most) consumers being able to vote
+ */
+ rpmpd_set_performance(&rpmpds[i]->pd, MAX_RPMPD_STATE);
+ rpmpd_power_on(&rpmpds[i]->pd);
}
return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(pdev->dev.of_node, data);
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists