linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/14] mm/hmm: cleanup special vma handling (VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180316191414.3223-9-jglisse@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:14:13 -0400
From:   jglisse@...hat.com
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@...dia.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] mm/hmm: cleanup special vma handling (VM_SPECIAL)

From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>

Special vma (one with any of the VM_SPECIAL flags) can not be access by
device because there is no consistent model accross device drivers on
those vma and their backing memory.

This patch directly use hmm_range struct for hmm_pfns_special() argument
as it is always affecting the whole vma and thus the whole range.

It also make behavior consistent after this patch both hmm_vma_fault()
and hmm_vma_get_pfns() returns -EINVAL when facing such vma. Previously
hmm_vma_fault() returned 0 and hmm_vma_get_pfns() return -EINVAL but
both were filling the HMM pfn array with special entry.

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: Evgeny Baskakov <ebaskakov@...dia.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Cc: Mark Hairgrove <mhairgrove@...dia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
---
 mm/hmm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index f674b73e7f4a..04595a994542 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -281,14 +281,6 @@ static int hmm_vma_do_fault(struct mm_walk *walk,
 	return -EAGAIN;
 }
 
-static void hmm_pfns_special(uint64_t *pfns,
-			     unsigned long addr,
-			     unsigned long end)
-{
-	for (; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, pfns++)
-		*pfns = HMM_PFN_SPECIAL;
-}
-
 static int hmm_pfns_bad(unsigned long addr,
 			unsigned long end,
 			struct mm_walk *walk)
@@ -486,6 +478,14 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void hmm_pfns_special(struct hmm_range *range)
+{
+	unsigned long addr = range->start, i = 0;
+
+	for (; addr < range->end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, i++)
+		range->pfns[i] = HMM_PFN_SPECIAL;
+}
+
 /*
  * hmm_vma_get_pfns() - snapshot CPU page table for a range of virtual addresses
  * @range: range being snapshoted and all needed informations
@@ -509,12 +509,6 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range)
 	struct mm_walk mm_walk;
 	struct hmm *hmm;
 
-	/* FIXME support hugetlb fs */
-	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL)) {
-		hmm_pfns_special(range->pfns, range->start, range->end);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	/* Sanity check, this really should not happen ! */
 	if (range->start < vma->vm_start || range->start >= vma->vm_end)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -528,6 +522,12 @@ int hmm_vma_get_pfns(struct hmm_range *range)
 	if (!hmm->mmu_notifier.ops)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* FIXME support hugetlb fs */
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL)) {
+		hmm_pfns_special(range);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* Initialize range to track CPU page table update */
 	spin_lock(&hmm->lock);
 	range->valid = true;
@@ -693,6 +693,12 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool write, bool block)
 	if (!hmm->mmu_notifier.ops)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* FIXME support hugetlb fs */
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL)) {
+		hmm_pfns_special(range);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* Initialize range to track CPU page table update */
 	spin_lock(&hmm->lock);
 	range->valid = true;
@@ -710,12 +716,6 @@ int hmm_vma_fault(struct hmm_range *range, bool write, bool block)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* FIXME support hugetlb fs */
-	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SPECIAL)) {
-		hmm_pfns_special(range->pfns, range->start, range->end);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	hmm_vma_walk.fault = true;
 	hmm_vma_walk.write = write;
 	hmm_vma_walk.block = block;
-- 
2.14.3