linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/22] signal: Move addr_lsb into the

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ccd9afa6-15d1-3e41-c1a4-3352d09c37a4@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:33:16 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/22] signal: Move addr_lsb into the _sigfault union for
 clarity

On 03/16/2018 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> It does not revert cleanly so I reverted it manually.  Patch doing that
>> is attached.  Should we do this, or is there a better option?
> Please see:
> 859d880cf544 ("signal: Correct the offset of si_pkey in struct siginfo")

It would be really nice to actually cc the folks that wrote and maintain
the code when you both break their stuff and fix it.  I don't see myself
or the x86 maintainers cc'd on any of this: the patch that caused the
breakage *or* the fix.