lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316205607.lr6nmrkkzzbw2tqh@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 23:56:07 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, toddpoynor@...gle.com,
        wei.vince.wang@...il.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennisz@...com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add config for readahead window

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:25:08AM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>
> 
> Change VM_MAX_READAHEAD value from the default 128KB to a configurable
> value. This will allow the readahead window to grow to a maximum size
> bigger than 128KB during boot, which could benefit to sequential read
> throughput and thus boot performance.

Increase of readahead window was proposed several times. And rejected.
IIRC, Linus was against it.

What is different this time?

> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
>  mm/Kconfig         | 8 ++++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index ad06d42adb1a..d7dc6125833e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2291,7 +2291,7 @@ int __must_check write_one_page(struct page *page);
>  void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk);
>  
>  /* readahead.c */
> -#define VM_MAX_READAHEAD	128	/* kbytes */
> +#define VM_MAX_READAHEAD	CONFIG_VM_MAX_READAHEAD_KB
>  #define VM_MIN_READAHEAD	16	/* kbytes (includes current page) */
>  
>  int force_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index c782e8fb7235..da9ff543bdb9 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -760,3 +760,11 @@ config GUP_BENCHMARK
>  	  performance of get_user_pages_fast().
>  
>  	  See tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_benchmark.c
> +
> +config VM_MAX_READAHEAD_KB
> +	int "Default max readahead window size in Kilobytes"
> +	default 128
> +	help
> +	  This sets the VM_MAX_READAHEAD value to allow the readahead window
> +	  to grow to a maximum size of configured. Increasing this value will
> +	  benefit sequential read throughput.
> -- 
> 2.16.2.804.g6dcf76e118-goog
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ