[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87zi37og4h.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:38:38 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"AKASHI\, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Appended signatures support for IMA appraisal
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Now the modsig is only ignored if it references a signature that is not
> present in IMA's keyring (or if there's a parsing error, obviously). If the
The above should read "Now the modsig is only ignored if it references a
*key* that is not present in IMA's keyring".
Sorry, I only noticed the mistake after sending the emails.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists