linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: add config for readahead window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180316145942.9e2d353ed10041fbac42e5a3@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:59:42 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Wei Wang <wei.vince.wang@...il.com>
Cc:     Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sherry Cheung <SCheung@...dia.com>,
        "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennisz@...com>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add config for readahead window

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 21:51:48 +0000 Wei Wang <wei.vince.wang@...il.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 14:33 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:25:08 -0700 Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Change VM_MAX_READAHEAD value from the default 128KB to a configurable
> > > value. This will allow the readahead window to grow to a maximum size
> > > bigger than 128KB during boot, which could benefit to sequential read
> > > throughput and thus boot performance.
> >
> > You can presently run ioctl(BLKRASET) against the block device?
> >
> 
> Yeah we are doing tuning in userland after init. But this is something we
> thought could help in very early stage.
> 

"thought" and "could" are rather weak!  Some impressive performance
numbers for real-world setups would help such a patch along.