lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g44NOFRmQbDJfRLw_SwsHwVB-hxsUYMYSmkqeyRKmXqSqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Mar 2018 05:52:14 +0000
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm: npcm: Enable L2 Cache in NPCM7xx

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:16 PM Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com> wrote:

> Enable L2 Cache in Nuvoton NPCM7xx BMC.

> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c
> index 5f7cd88103ef..c5f77d854c4f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c
> @@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ static const char *const npcm7xx_dt_match[] = {
>   DT_MACHINE_START(NPCM7XX_DT, "NPCM7XX Chip family")
>          .atag_offset    = 0x100,
>          .dt_compat      = npcm7xx_dt_match,
> +       .l2c_aux_val    = 0x0,
> +       .l2c_aux_mask   = ~0x0,

You need to limit this to the specific bit(s) you want to set and verify
that
the l2c driver does not already manage that bit appropriately and that it
can
not be specified via the dtsi.

We discussed this a little while ago with Rob here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg613372.html

>   MACHINE_END
> --
> 2.14.1


Cheers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ