[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316085240.GG4151@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 01:52:40 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/36] fs: add ksys_write() helper; remove in-kernel
calls to sys_write()
I really don't like this, as this is the wrong level of abstraction.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c
> index 79b7a3438d54..5a9cfde5fc28 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(s390_write, unsigned int, fd, const char __user *, buf, c
> if ((compat_ssize_t) count < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return sys_write(fd, buf, count);
> + return ksys_write(fd, buf, count);
> }
This looks bogus to me. Why does s390 have its own compat version of
write but not any of the other read and write familty calls?
> diff --git a/init/do_mounts_rd.c b/init/do_mounts_rd.c
> index 99e0b649fc0e..2d365c398ccc 100644
> --- a/init/do_mounts_rd.c
> +++ b/init/do_mounts_rd.c
> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ int __init rd_load_image(char *from)
> printk("Loading disk #%d... ", disk);
> }
> sys_read(in_fd, buf, BLOCK_SIZE);
> - sys_write(out_fd, buf, BLOCK_SIZE);
> + ksys_write(out_fd, buf, BLOCK_SIZE);
> #if !defined(CONFIG_S390)
> if (!(i % 16)) {
> pr_cont("%c\b", rotator[rotate & 0x3]);
All the do_mounts / initramfs code should be rewritten to use filp_open
and vfs_read/vfs_write instead of adding hacks like this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists