[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180316090435.GB5852@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:04:35 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] x86/microcode/AMD: Check microcode file sanity
before loading it
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:40:40AM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> I thought the one week absolute minimum resend time is for the case that
> there are no comments to a patch, or, more generally, when there is no
> action and not for "normal process" respins.
>
> submitting-patches.rst says:
> > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
> > but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should
> > receive comments within a week or so;
Well, it says that *exactly* - you should receive comments within a
week. In your case, you got some of them even earlier.
Think of it this way: one week is more or less ok period when reviewers
have time to go through a patchset and give their comments. Keep in mind
that maintainers/reviewers get other patchsets to review too and they
can't always react immediately. In *addition* to the other crap they
have on their plate.
So patience is a good idea here :)
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists